VENEZIA.66

 

White MateriAl

di Claire Denis

Francia 2009, 100'

 

In Concorso

 

22/30

White Material takes place in remote, anonymous part of Africa which is being tormented by civil war. A French family business is caught inside a violent power struggle between the rebels and the government militia as the French Army retreats. The politics behind “Café Vial” are as complicated as the ones driving the country: the land along with the coffee crops belongs to father and son, but it is being run solely by the son’s ex-wife (Huppert), who the father entrusted with the job. Marie owns nothing, but is responsible for everything, so she sees the land as belonging to her. She doesn’t want her property to be taken away from her and she doesn’t see a future for herself in France, so she tries with all her might to keep the business alive, despite the constant calls which urge her to give up. Both the rebels and the government want her out, her ex-husband doesn’t see a point in carrying on. Still, that doesn’t discourage Marie who hires new workers and tends to the crops. This decision sends her family down a spiral of pain and suffering.
First of all, I’d give White Material props for the mere presence of a plot and a setting (which many movies at the festival this year seem to lack). The story unravels without unnecessary stops for pretentious monologues, the narration is solid and brilliantly aided by the ever-present voice of a local radio dj, who follows the rebels during their mission to close in on white land owners. The tension mounts while the movie heads for it’s gruesome climax, a glimpse of which Denis presents to us at the beginning of the movie and which we gradually come to understand. The drama which is the participation of children in the conflict is depicted realistically, with an edge similar to Johnny Mad Dog. As for the acting, I’d say it’s pretty good, but I definitely expected more from Huppert, a stroke of genius that never came.
White Material isn’t a straight-forward movie, in the sense that the protagonists’ actions aren’t obvious at first thought. Marie’s teenage son, who is rebel in his own right (he doesn’t fit in in Africa), gets threatened with a gun and humiliated by two child guerillas. In the next scene he shaves his head, steals his father’s rifle and joins the rebels himself - as the easiest thing capable of letting you forget you pain is inflicting pain on someone else, even if it’s the ones you love. It’s like what you might see at school: children that are regularly harassed by bullies often turn into bullies themselves. Judging by the reaction of the audience, the final scene (which I won’t give away) also left many clueless, but if you watch the movie closely, you will find that Marie’s action wasn’t that illogical.
On a grander scale, I believe the movie deals with the way Europeans tend to falsely idealize some parts of the Third World. For it’s local inhabitants Africa means surviving on a day-to-day basis, it’s about protecting yourself and you family, dealing with hard-boiled facts. For Marie, on the other hand, Africa is a place to run away to, an anti-depressant, a form of placebo. It’s pure escapism, a means to fill some existential void. No matter how hard she tries to blend in with the surrounding, in the end she sees only what she wishes to see (as returning to France seems more terrifying to her then anything else) and subconsciously believes that the color of her skin will protect her at any time, just like a bullet-proof vest. So, although I acknowledge her strength and character, I can’t say she’s innocent, as is nobody else in White Material.
 

06:09:2009

SITO UFFICIALE

 

66.ma mostra
le recensioni

Venezia, 02/12 settembre 2009